Saturday, 29 December 2012

Website Review - Good Spanking Classics

Were you paying attention? No checking your notes now - how closely did you read the review of Chelsea Pfeiffer's Good Spanking site that I published last week?

Do you remember the mention of it's sister site, Good Spanking Classics? You do? Oh, of course you do! How could I ever doubt you?

Anyway, when you join Good Spanking there is the option to simultaneously join Good Spanking Classics (hereafter to be referred to as GSC, in order to save the tips of my poor battered fingers just a little work), for a very decent saving over their individual prices.

You can, of course, join the site as a stand alone too, for the very reasonable fee of US S20.99.

GSC is different to most spanking video sites, in that rather than producing new material, it presents old films made by Chelsea Pfeiffer Enterprises back in the day when these things circulated almost entirely on video.

The introductory screen, which also serves as a preview screen for the curious, explains the idea behind it, and boasts that the site contains 124 photo stories (some entries feature more than 1 story), split into 973 video clips. It also has 4122 still photos.

The screen also gives a summary of each recent clip, along with a couple of photos from it. The descriptions are great; they're chatty, and kind of gossipy, talking about the performers with massive affection, and placing each film into a historical context (in terms of the history of CPE, that is).

I'd really like to learn more about the clips, such as when they were filmed for instance.

As with Chelsea's other site, the films here are 100% female spanking female. Actually, the last entry to the site makes me a liar here, as it is one of only two M/F films that CPE ever shot. However, unless you enjoy F/F films (as I do, to a massive degree) you might prefer to stay clear of this site.

When you log in, you come to a two page Table of contents, which is similar to the introductory screen, but with rather more movies on it.

Each film has the aforementioned summary, and 2 sample shots, along with the date of posting, links to collections of still images from the film, and further links to download the actual video files. Each film is typically made up of around 10 clips, although there are shorter ones, and several much longer ones (one recent presentation runs to 18 parts).

File sizes are fairly small, averaging around 20 meg, so downloads are fast, and I haven't come across any download limits at all. As with Good Spanking, file names can be a bit variable so it's worth downloading each film into a separate folder.

The site can also be navigated via an Index of Girls, with a linkable list of each girl's performances. This is a nice idea, and makes tracking down your favourites extremely easy.

All of which brings us rather inevitably to the clips, which are both the major strength and the weakness of the site.

First of all I have to say that the films are massively entertaining, and it's difficult not to feel nostalgic whilst watching them. The acting, especially in some of the earliest videos, would not be generally acceptable today, and many of the spankings seem extremely mild. It's clear that a number of the performers have never really topped before, with the first slaps being tentative at best.

Some of the plots seem a little over-familiar, but that is not the fault of the producers. You have to bear in mind that these films were made 15 years or so ago (in the case of the earliest ones), and while the, for example, spanking therapy plot is commonplace now, it was fresh back then.

There are several things that I particularly like:-

1. many of the spankings are of more realistic length than we tend to see nowadays, to such an extent that several films feature multiple spankings, often in totally different stories that just feature the same performers. The CP Theatre entries are fine examples of this (but I'd love to see Parts 2 and 3!)

2. we get to see the first of the Chelsea Spanks films (see the review of Good Spanking for more details of these)

3. I can't really explain this, but many of the films have an innocence and charm that tends to be missing from modern day films. It may be a combination of models that I haven't seen before, a slightly less professional approach to production than Chelsea's current work has and an awareness of the age of the films, but somehow they seem quite sweet.

4. lots of over the knee hand spanking. I'm still a traditionalist at heart, and these type of clips turn me on more than any others. Which is why we're here, right?

What don't I like? Easily answered (although this may be a factor in no. 3 above); the quality of the clips is very variable. Clearly these films have been transferred from a video source, and, in some cases, the source is far from perfect. This is perhaps to be expected given their vintage nature.

Various clips have video interference, variable volume levels and noise interference too. I wouldn't be honest if I didn't admit that, in some clips, these factors do affect my enjoyment of the material on offer.

I must stress however that this is not a problem with the majority of the films, where the image quality might be a little soft but is otherwise fine.

So, should you plonk your hard earned cash down on the table for Good Spanking Classics? The monthly cost is very reasonable, you'll see films and models that you can't do anywhere else, and, especially if you've been around the scene for some time, you'll get a snootful of the whiff of nostalgia. The clips are fun, and the spankings frequent.

I think that the site is well worth a visit; most spanking fans will find much to treasure and enjoy here.

I think that'll do for now.

All the best


Photos are taken from Good Spanking Classics

One final image; when I first started searching the internet for spanking I came across this shot, and I was desperate to see the video that it came from. The spanker just seemed to be having so much fun, and i found the outfits to be extremely hot. It's taken me a few years but finally I've found it. It didn't disappoint me either. Thanks Chelsea.


  1. Thanks, again, for another thoughtful and positive review of one of my sites!

    1. This comment has been removed by the author.